Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 11/10/06 12:06 +0100, Phillip Lord wrote: > >> I'm a wee bit confused. >> >> I'm currently using muse 3.02.92 which is dated from august. I >> gather that this is older than 3.02.8 which is a little >> counter-intuitive to me. >> >> Can you explain the numbering scheme for me? >> >> Thanks >> >> Phil >> > > I guess 3.02.0x is bug fixes for stable release 3.02. 3.02.9x is > development releases which will become 3.03.
Yep. All of the changes in 3.02.8 were already part of 3.02.92. I just wanted to fix a couple of bugs for the muse-el Debian package, basically. I'm currently trying to decide if I want to backport the fix for the XEmacs beta compilation bug and call it 3.02.9 (it probably won't happen for at least two weeks, though, even if I do decide to do it). -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM. See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.
pgp2NKkbjhS5o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Muse-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/muse-el-discuss
