On 11/10/06, Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Adrian Tritschler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been experimenting with using muse-blosxom to publish *.muse
> files, then processing these with pyblosxom to produce static html, it
> all seems to do what I expect, with a few oddities.
>
> With the muse files in arbitray directories under ~/muse, blosxom
> files under ~/blosxom and html under ~/published I find the following:
>
> ~/muse/abc.muse publishes to ~/blosxom/abc.txt
> ~/muse/test/def.muse publishes to ~/blosxom/test/def.txt
>
> Both as expected, however;
>
> ~/muse/test/2006/xyz.txt publishes to two files
> ~/blosxom/test/2006/xyz.txt and ~/blosxom/2006/xyz.txt
>
> As a result of the duplication, the blosxom generated index.html
> include two copies of the text in the original muse entry.
>
> Is it a bug, operator error, or am I misunderstanding something in how
> it operates?
It looks like a bug. I've filed it on our bugtracker.
Is this bug fixed now? I thought it was, but after several months
away from muse I've had another look at it and it seems to still be
present.
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Muse-el-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/muse-el-discuss
