That makes a lot of sense (both your explanation of the spec semantics and 
how it should work in Muse) - I assume you're offering to help?  ;)

Dan



"Jared A. Zebedee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/28/2007 04:17:48 
PM:

> Hi Dan,
> 
> Thanks for your response.
> 
> I'll reiterate just to make sure we're aligned:
> 
> The GetMetadata operation accepts two parameters: 
> Dialect, and Identifier
> 
> The Dialect parameter specifies the type of Document to be retrieved.
> The Identifier parameter specifies the desired Namespace of the Metadata
> to be retrieved.
> 
> In my case, I want to retrieve the XSD that contains my Resource
> Manager's custom Resource Properties (ones that I have defined).
> According to the WS-MEX specification, I would issue a request with the
> following parameters:
> 
> Dialect: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
> Identifier: http://mymanagersite.com/services/myManager
> 
> To fully support the specification, however, it should be possible to
> omit the Identifier parameter, which should return all XML Schema
> Metadata defined by the Resource Manager.  I believe we can better
> conceptualize this if we think of the XML Schema as "collections of
> Metadata (categorized by Namespace)" rather than independent documents.
> 
> In terms of implementation, I don't think this should be too difficult.
> Muse aggregates everything into the WSDL document, so it should be
> possible to parse out the desired Metadata by matching against the
> Dialect and Identifier parameters.
> 
> To elaborate:
> 
> In the WSDL Document, XML schema is defined as: <wsdl:definitions ..
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";  ...>
> 
> The GetMetadata operation, with a specified Dialect of
> "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";, should be able to parse out all
> elements that begin with <xsd:.>
> 
> That takes care of parsing out the XML Schema from the WSDL.  The next
> step is to parse out only the XML Schema that belongs to the desired
> Namespace.  Referring to the section of my WSDL that includes the XML
> schema for my resource (after Muse has combined everything), we have:
> 
> <xsd:schema elementFormDefault="qualified"
> targetNamespace="http://mymanagersite.com/services/myManager"; >
> 
> The GetMetadata operation should be able to identify the namespace
> declared here (and match it to the Identifier parameter), so that it
> only returns the elements in that section.
> 
> Here is my motivation: It is important to have access to the XML Schema
> for a Resource Manager, because it contains the Resource Properties'
> data type declarations.  It also allows retrieval of the available
> Resource Properties without querying their values (it doesn't depend on
> the state of the Resource).
> 
> Currently, I am using GetMetadata to retrieve the entire WSDL document,
> and then parsing out the XML schema I need.  This involves a data
> transfer of over 100 kilobytes, which is rather inefficient, considering
> that I only need the XML schema (which amounts to about 3 kilobytes in
> my case).  I believe the same effect could be achieved much more
> efficiently by fully implementing the GetMetadata operation.
> 
> Your thoughts?
> 
> - Jared Zebedee
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Jemiolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: 'Wilson, Kirk D'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Using GetMetadata to obtain XML Schema Document
> 
> The 09/2004 spec seems to offer identifiers for WSDL, XSD, and
> WS-Policy, 
> but WSDL was the only one that made sense for us given the effort we go
> to 
> in resolving the WSDL and making it available to the client (without 
> resolving the imports, you'd have to do a lot of plumbing to get all the
> 
> docs on disk and then parse them). I guess my question is, if you use
> the 
> XSD identifier, do you want all schema files? When you say "the XSD", it
> 
> implies there is one - perhaps the one you wrote, and not the WS-* XSDs.
> 
> Let me know what you meant so I can offer a suggestion on achieving
> this.
> 
> Also - the response you get is the closest WS-MEX has as far as
> indicating 
> "no metadata". The spec doesn't have any faults for GetMetadata, so the 
> simplest thing was to return no metadata elements for the given 
> dialect/identifier pair.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> "Jared A. Zebedee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/27/2007 05:55:44 
> PM:
> 
> > Greetings all,
> > 
> > I am attempting to use the GetMetadata operation to retrieve the XML
> > Schema Document for a MUWS Resource Manager.
> > 
> > The GetMetadata operation accepts 2 parameters:  Dialect, and
> Identifier
> > 
> > According to the specification, acceptable values for Dialect include:
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema (For retrieving the XML Schema
> > document)
> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/ (For retrieving the WSDL document)
> > 
> > I have successfully used the GetMetadata operation to obtain the
> entire
> > WSDL document.  However, when I try to use it to obtain the XML Schema
> > Document, the response I receive is empty (I get a proper response
> with
> > no Metadata included).  In both cases, I am specifying the URI of my
> > Resource Manager as the Identifier.
> > 
> > Does anyone know if this operation has yet been fully implemented in
> > Muse?  I would like to be able to retrieve the XML Schema Document,
> > rather than the entire WSDL document.  For the time being, I can
> filter
> > through the WSDL document to obtain the data I need, but this is not
> > very efficient.
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > Jared Zebedee
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to