> On January 9, 2012 at 3:02:04 PM Veronica Merryfield
> veronica.merryfield@shaw.cawrote:>
> My feel is that to make it right, it probably needs more than a bit of
> adjustment.
If this is to be fixed, I think it needs to be an organized effort. I scan down
the page and see all the things wrong: misinformation, disorganized
presentation... how much of this stuff even needs to be in the article? As much
as historical arcane synthesis trivia gets me off, I don't think it needs to
make up the bulk of the article (even pretending for a moment that it's
correct, organized and well written). It's a mess, and I'll break out in hives
if I seriously consider doing something about it myself. I'd suggest a group
effort, but the history and talk page hint at a total nightmare. Someone
(hello!) has already had fun trying to fix it, and gotten the page locked. That
Clusternote guy needs to release his death grip before any progress can be
made.
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
