---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------

Subject: Re: [music-dsp] how to derive spectrum of random sample-and-hold noise?

From: "Ross Bencina" <rossb-li...@audiomulch.com>

Date: Tue, November 3, 2015 11:51 pm

To: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu

--------------------------------------------------------------------------



> On 4/11/2015 5:26 AM, Ethan Duni wrote:

>> Do you mean the literal Fourier spectrum of some realization of this

>> process, or the power spectral density? I don't think you're going to

>> get a closed-form expression for the former (it has a random component).

>

> I am interested in the long-term magnitude spectrum. I had assumed

> (wrongly?) that in the limit (over an infinite length series), that the

> fourier integral would converge. And modeling in that way would be

> (slightly) more familiar to me. However, If autocorrelation or psd is

> the better way to characterize the spectra of random signals then I

> should learn about that.
�
it is the correct way to characterize the spectra of random signals. �the 
spectra (PSD) is the Fourier Transform of autocorrelation and is scaled as 
magnitude-squared. � so if you're gonna look at the spectrum in dB, it's 
10*log10() not
20*log10().
�
but it ain't gonna be easy. �however, i *think* you gotta 'nuf information. 
�this is basically a Markov process.
�
setting aside a complex random signal, autocorrelation is first expressed as a 
time-average of the product of your random
signal times itself with a given lag. �it's an even function, so the PSD will 
be real.
�
with the assumption of ergodicity, the time average can be replaced with a 
probabilistic average for the same quantity. �i think there is enough 
information in your description to
calculate the probabilistic average of the product of your random signal times 
itself displaced by a given lag.
�
i have a sneaky suspicion that this Markov process is gonna be something like 
pink noise. �maybe with different slopes (of dB vs. log frequency) depending on
parameter P. �probabilistically holding on to a previous sample will have an 
LPF effect.






--
�


r b-j � � � � � � � � � r...@audioimagination.com
�


"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
_______________________________________________
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp

Reply via email to