On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:20:29 +0100, Chris Bransden wrote on mb-users:
On 12/01/07, Erik Dalén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I understand it remastered releases should be added as a new release
with a remaster AR to the original even if the track list hasn't
changed,
right?
i seem to recall there being something in the wiki that says as much,
but i
can't find it, and there never seemed to be a rational reason for it
anyway
when we merge vinyl versions (all different formats are mastered
separately), different label releases, boxset versions, etc, etc.
none of my subscribed artists have their mastered versions separated out
-
the users have voted with their edits :)
I believe this is about
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/RemasterRelationshipType
Is there any other page that mentions explicitly that remasters should be
entered as separate releases? Should the guidelines be changed? Or should
we wait until Lukas' labels come out, since they might affect the whole
issue?
DonRedman
--
Words that are written in CamelCase refer to WikiDocs,
the MusicBrainz documentation system.
Go to http://musicbrainz.org/doc/<SomeTerm>
(you might need to transform the term to singular)
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
