On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Kuno Woudt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:50:28AM -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote: > > Actually, if I said that in the sandbox, I'd happily remove it, whereever > it > > is. The goal of that document is to lay out a structure for classical, > not > > to say where to use that structure. When and where to use CSG (or not) > > would seem, to me, to belong somewhere other than in the guideline for > the > > style. > > It seems very important to me! If CSG doesn't end up in release titles > and track titles in the database i'll never see it in my tags sand I have > no interest in discussing it. It also seems weird to call it a style > guideline in that case, it would be an effort to model classical music for > its own sake, with hardly any relation to musicbrainz.
I think this might be something that could be implemented through Picard the same way things like ARs and foreign artist names are handled. Some people like to have the original Japanese name, some people prefer to be able to read it in English. Either way, the data is there, and it is up to the user on how they tag their files. Pavan Chander // navap
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
