A quick answer :) The notes on translated/transliterated releases are actually more of a proposal, one that needs debating along with the rest of the proposals/questions on http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Talk:Release_Group.
Pavan Chander // navap On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Aaron Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > One quick comment. > > Guideline says, "If there are two versions of a release in different > languages; each language would be its own release group." What about > for Translations/Transliterations? It appears these were > automatically merged into the same release groups on test (I'm > thinking of the Complete Beethoven Edition, Volume 1 and 2). Why > aren't we merging albums just because of the language difference? As > far as I've seen, RateYourMusic.com groups albums even if the titles > are in different languages (some Beatles albums come to mind). > > -cooperaa > > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Chad Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all > > > > As you most know, very soon Release Groups will be live. Style is > > obviously a work in progress as we're not sure how it's all going to > > work out across the variations in the real world but the basic cases are > > reasonably well known. Pronik, prodoc, gioele, navap, ruaok and I have > > put together a starting point which I think we need some wider comment > > and discussion on now. > > > > I have made an executive decision and merged a couple of pages together > > into a Style/Terminology page at at > > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Release_Group > > > > There are some open points on the Discussion page on the wiki; please > > take a look at them. I also think the rules around use of the "type" and > > "title" are possibly a bit weak currently. > > > > We also need documentation for the edit types; I'll try and get to that > > too; but I think the main style and discussion should stem from the > > above page. > > > > Comments/feedback/argument? > > > > Chad / voice > > > > PS: I apologise to any feathers ruffled by my > > merge/re-structure/redirects, but I felt it was important to have a > > single page to talk about and have something roughly similar to the > > structure of other terminology and guideline pages to present a > > reasonably clear and unified face to users from day 1. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
