On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:06 PM, caramel <carame...@ymail.com> wrote: > >> >> My gut feeling is that Track Title and Recording Title should be handled >> differently, as follows: >> >> Track Titles should get as little "normalization" as possible/practical. >> >> Recording Titles (on the other hand) should be normalized much as Work >> Titles will be. The difference (in my mind) is that a Recording Title >> will reflect the particulars of that Recording, e.g. >> orchestration/instrumentation/transposition. > > Yes but mainly through ARs not in the title. > In fact, the relations are N tracks to 1 recordings, and N recordings to 1 > Work. So the recordings are more stable/normalize than tracks, and works > should be fully (strictly) normalized. > > But if we tag using MB, we'll get track titles... so better to maintain them > not so dirt.
One of the main options of the first fully-NGS-adapted Picard will probably be allowing the use of recordings instead of tracks for tagging (with the user choosing what he wants, of course). > Olivier > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
