On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Yin Izanami <yind...@gmail.com> wrote: > What happens if a label changes the URL structure of their website? I'm > concerned this will eventually lead to a countless number of dead links, if > said changes aren't fixable by a simple script.
The changes should at least be *detectable* with a script, even if they have to be fixed by hand (that's what we do now when Wikipedia deletes / merges pages, for example) > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:21 AM, jacobbrett <jacobbr...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Calvin Walton-2 wrote: >> > >> > Now with infinitely more wiki page templates, and its very own RFC >> > number! >> > >> > This proposal is to add or change two ARs: >> > >> > * Official Homepage >> > >> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Kepstin/Official_Homepage_Relationship_Type_Proposal >> > >> > A new Release Group → URL relation will be added to the Official >> > Homepage relationship type, to allow linking releases groups to >> > an official website published by the artist or label. >> > >> > * Discography Entry >> > >> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Kepstin/Discography_Entry_Relationship_Type >> > >> > A new Release → URL relationship type, to allow linking >> > individual versions of releases to sub-pages of discography >> > sites. >> > >> > I'm still not entirely sure what to do with the wording on the Official >> > Homepage relation: should I use a different wording for release groups >> > than the other types? Or should I change them all to be consistent? >> > >> > Discuss! >> > >> > -- >> > Calvin Walton <calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > >> Perhaps "has an official homepage at" (and vice versa) should be used >> instead, as: >> >> Firstly, IMO "website" isn't consistent terminology with "homepage"; it >> should be "webpage". >> >> Though, then my concern is that "official webpage" may be confused with >> any >> release listing on an artist's website. >> >> Thus, "official homepage" is probably more apt than "official website". >> >> Is that too pedantic? :P >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-324-v2-Official-Website-and-Discography-Entry-ARs-for-Releases-Release-Groups-tp3585730p3588549.html >> Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
