Paul Taylor <[email protected]> writes: <snip: lots of text that I agree with> > Treating analog different to digital is a bad idea. But it might be > worth revisiting why we need track times AND recording times for CD's, > when do they actually differ ?
This raises a question for me: is there any point in a recording having a stored length? And if so, what should it mean? Has this been decided and written down anywhere? It seems to me that a recording is always going to be given a length that is equal to one of the track lengths it gets on a release. As a result, does this extra fragment of information actually mean anything to anyone? Rupert
pgpVMMBYHv6HS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
