Simon Reinhardt wrote > > In the instrument tree I would like some of the generic terms changed to > the way they are mostly credited on releases: > > - percussion instruments -> percussion > - string instruments -> strings >
Those generic terms have two interpretations: as the label for a category of more detailed instrument names, and as a non-specific term to use in performance Relationships. Should these terms be used in performance Relationships at all, or should they only be labels for a category? And in fact, how often are they used in performance Relationships? The present wording sounds fine to me if they are labels for a category. The proposed wording sounds like an improvement only for using them in performance Relationships. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz-mailing-lists.2986109.n2.nabble.com/RFC-Percussion-and-string-instruments-tp7095474p7096408.html Sent from the Style discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
