Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 00:22, Nikki <aei...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Note that we're not allowed to rename relationships, so the actual name >> of the relationship type will need to remain as "performance". The link >> phrases can be updated of course. > > Do you mean that the names in the XML Web service mustn't change, or > even what the dropdown box in our UI says? If only a part of what is > visible to users is changed I think that the inconsistency is worse > than the problem it fixes.
The former (the dropdowns use the link phrases, hence all the curly brackets). The name is shown on http://musicbrainz.org/admin/linktype/recording-work however. >> I really don't see the point in changing the class, but since I think we >> should get rid of the whole class concept (whatever it even is) anyway, >> I don't care enough to argue against it. > > Can you elaborate on this? Is it recordings we shouldn't have, or a > separation between different kinds of recordings? Hmm? The "class" is just a category in the wiki with a special name. Nikki _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
