To recap: The Performance Relationship Type identifies separate recordings of the same work as separate performances of it, though in reality they may not be. Also, it's listed as part of the Performance Relationship Class, but it doesn't fit the class description and has nothing in common with the other relationships in that class. I propose changing the Performance Relationship Type to a Recording Relationship Type and placing it in a more appropriate class.
Following Nicolás and Calvin's suggestions at the end of the RFC thread (linked below), I've prioritized and reshuffled the steps to accomplish this. Details in Jira: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-102 Previous discussion: http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?pid=17589 http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/quot-recording-quot-quot-performance-quot-td4435768.html http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-102-Change-Performance-Relationship-Type-to-Recording-Relationship-Type-td4496712.html Expiration date: 2012-04-05 -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-102-Change-Performance-Relationship-Type-to-Recording-Relationship-Type-tp4526697p4526697.html Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
