But, don't all flavours lead to a new recording, making explanation (laying one track over another) unnecessary?
On 22 April 2013 11:33, symphonick <[email protected]> wrote: > Then you may have to explain exactly what you mean with "overdubbing", > since it's used in almost every [pop] studio recording made since the > advent of multi-track tape recorders. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overdubbing > > > > 2013/4/22 Tom Crocker <[email protected]> > >> I agree that which relationships to use in which cases is an issue to >> discuss separately. But if it would help rocknrollarchivist you could add >> 'overdub' to the list of possible name for different mixes in the usage >> guide (since it clearly falls into this category within our definition, >> regardless of what relationships it should have) >> >> >> On 21 April 2013 15:26, LordSputnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> symphonick wrote >>> > About relationships & recordings: since we're missing a >>> performance/source >>> > level above recordings, relationships that in theory links to the >>> source >>> > audio will be more or less inaccurate. E.g. technically a remix >>> > (mb-recording) usually isn't related to an old mix (=mb-recording), >>> but to >>> > the source audio (tracks). Close enough when we can establish an >>> original >>> > mix maybe, but what should you link to when there's both an "album >>> > version" >>> > and a "radio edit" available? >>> >>> I think this is probably a problem with the existing guidelines too - I >>> expect if there's no clear original version people just won't use the >>> relationship for those recordings. >>> >>> It may be possible to say "link to the originally released mix of the >>> performance", which should always give a recording to link to. However, >>> if >>> the originally release mix is the remix, that could be a problem. Since >>> this >>> isn't directly related to redefining recordings (it's partly an existing >>> problem), perhaps we could solve it separately? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4651886.html >>> Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > > > > -- > > /symphonick > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
