Yeah, but that's doable for releases; not for works IMO. BTW my CSG works proposal got stuck again. I'm toying with the idea of writing a MB works guideline first, and add the classical stuff later.
But don't blame me for "When_does_the_CSG_apply" ;-) 2013/10/21 monxton <[email protected]> > On 05/10/2013 10:43, symphonick wrote: > > & IMO classifying works as "classical" / "non-classical" should be > > avoided at all costs. You'd have to spend a LOT of time defining > > "classical" first. > > You're right, but then we do this every time we make the decision "does > CSG apply to this release?" or sometimes even we decide on a > track-by-track basis within a release. It's amusing how > "http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Classical/#When_does_the_CSG_apply.3F"; > is currently blank. > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- /symphonick
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
