2014/1/2 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:55 AM, jesus2099 <hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org>wrote: > >> -1 >> I would prefer keeping simple VENUE for churches (rather than STUDIO). >> I don’t think what important is the primary type of place. >> IMO the important is the used type of place, whether VENUE or STUDIO. >> where a VENUE place will contain more LIVE music recordings and STUDIO >> places will include more recording sessions. > > > That makes no sense - churches are used for lots of non-live classical > recordings as well as for lives. If you only care about whether the > recording is live, you have the attribute on the recording-work rel anyway. >
Hm, obviously I missed a (perfectly valid) part of your point :-P -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
