On 10/29/2014 12:53 PM, caller#6 wrote:
On 10/29/2014 12:47 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-10-29 19:39 GMT+01:00 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
<reosare...@gmail.com <mailto:reosare...@gmail.com>>:
Forgot to mention, also, that part of the idea is to get rid of
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Style/Specific_types_of_releases/Opera at
the same time, since that basically only says "put as much info
as possible on opera track titles, even if not on the release"
which seems to mostly go against what we're moving towards with NGS.
I'm all for removing standardization on classical track titles (apart
from prepending the work name as recommended in your draft). As long
as all the tracks of a release use a consistent formatting, no problem.
Does that mean you disagree with standardizing the separators? (i.e.
colon for parts, dot for movements)
Oh. As usual, I was misreading things.
The current draft, as I now understand it, only calls specifically for
colons when the existing separator is a newline (or some other "block
level" indication?). So it's in line with subtitle style.
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
