a few comments on the already posted comments:

some time ago i sat down next to the mentioned example dancer (who responded
with a comment to the effect of "here comes the heat") and  tried to explain
concepts of number of beats to a step, asked if he had trouble hearing the
rhythm, how his dancing affects the dancing of those around him, etc. after
this his dancing improved somewhat for a few weeks, then back to the
original goofing off. 

this person is not a 'hot shot'. 'hot shots' often do become good dancers,
as 'hot shotting' at least shows that they are interested enough to be
really good dancers, but are a bit ahead of themselves. this uncaring person
simply doesn't know what step is next, which direction to go, because he
isn't paying attention.

as for people smiling and having fun: without question this is good, and
important. but not the sole criteria. in this case, for example, the
mentioned person is always grinning; clearly, a well executed dance is not
the reason for it. regularly attending, fun loving, smiling people who don't
care enough about contra dancing to do it correctly on a basic level are not
adding anything positive to the dance, only to themselves. and, in fact,
drive away many people who are interested in contra dancing. i'm sure that i
will get criticized for this, but i would rather this person stop coming to
the dance, then come, having a 'fun' time, and making a less 'fun' time for
others. a sense of community and being tolerant of others is good, but it
goes both ways. the 'uncaring' dancers are not showing any sense of
community/responsibility for the activity that they are participating in.

jeffrey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Stephen Moore
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:00 AM
> To: A list for dance organizers
> Subject: Re: [Organizers] uncaring "bad" dancers
> 
> When I read the post yesterday about the dancers (guys...) 
> who are late because they're having fun flirting I 
> immediately thought of one fellow at one of our local dances. 
>  Then Chris writing about a "hot shot" was a very different 
> picture.  The fellow I thought of does this dreamy kind of 
> doe-eyed dancing/flirting and when I follow him down the set 
> just about every woman he dances with arrives late, often 
> because she's having to disentangle herself from his dreamy 
> allemande or whatever figure.  I don't know what can really 
> be done about that... the power of the dance organizer is 
> somewhat limited, and besides, I wouldn't want everyone to be 
> just perfect, because then when I'm in a playful mood (which 
> is not infrequent) I might have to overly restrain my impulses!
> 
> I remember years ago someone saying to me, "Every woman who 
> leaves dancing with you has a smile on her face.", which may 
> or may not be true, but it's stuck with me as a measure of 
> when a dance is going well... if people are smiling and 
> laughing, the particulars of how the dance is going really 
> doesn't make too much difference.
> 
> Stephen Moore
> Lenox, MA Contra Dance
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Chris Weiler wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jeffrey,
> >
> > The name that I've been using for this type of dancer is 
> "hot shot". 
> > For them it's more about showing off and flourishes than community. 
> > Having danced for a while now, I'm convinced that most people go 
> > through this stage before they move on to being more of a community 
> > dancer. I'm guilty of spending some time dancing like that, too.
> >
> > My interpretation of the phrase "only here to have fun" leads me to 
> > think that they are more commenting on feeling pressured 
> and lectured 
> > about their dancing. Maybe if they were approached with 
> more positive 
> > approach. "I would have enjoyed our dance more if you had 
> been on time 
> > for the balance." "It's such a thrill when you help me get to the 
> > right person in time for the next move."
> >
> > I'm getting a little humorous, but I think that I'm making my point.
> > Make the comments about how we personally experience their 
> actions and 
> > not about doing it "wrong" and it could get a whole different 
> > reaction.
> >
> > Maybe I'll take some heat for this, but I believe that 
> there are very 
> > few "bad" dancers in this world. There are only people who haven't 
> > practiced enough to learn what good and bad dancing means. It just 
> > takes some people longer than others to learn the lessons. They 
> > deserve our patience and some straightforward feedback.
> >
> > I would love to hear other people's thoughts about this as well.
> >
> > Chris Weiler
> > Goffstown, NH
> >
> > P.S. You didn't miss any previous posts. I compiled some 
> interesting 
> > e-mails from the Caller's list and sent them to this one.
> >
> >
> >
> > [email protected] wrote:
> >> i've seen a few replies recently talking about dealing 
> with certain 
> >> types of "bad" dancers. (perhaps i am not receiving some 
> posts, since 
> >> i didn't see the originals that were being replied to). i am 
> >> interested in hearing comments on a particular type of 
> "bad" dancer. 
> >> i am referring to people that can be depended on to be late and/or 
> >> confused about the next step, but NOT because they suffer 
> from some 
> >> physical infirmity, and NOT because of lack of experience. 
> they may 
> >> have been attending dances for months or years. it is because they 
> >> seem to be more interested in flirting with partner then in paying 
> >> attention to the dance. they are the type that if spoken to about 
> >> their lack of paying attention will excuse themselves by 
> explaining 
> >> that they are "only here to have fun".  of course, fun for 
> them means 
> >> less fun for those dancing near them.
> >>
> >> comments?
> >>
> >> Jeffrey
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Organizers mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Organizers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Organizers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers

Reply via email to