On 2008/11/14 09:10, Christ Schlacta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm in favor of scrapping the current protocol and redesigning from > the ground up with a 2.0 protocol that's separate from the current > protocol. publish:subscribe, compression, and encryption are all > decent candidates for a protocol version bump.
Please describe your idea of publish:subscribe, and how it is advantageous over the current "idle". Compression and encryption can be implemented as transport layer for the current protocol. I'm not convinced that we need a redesign. If something needs to be improved, fixed or added, let's do it, but I see no reason to start from scratch. Although grown, the MPD protocol is fine. > all I ask is that if you add SSL, please make sure you add client > key authentication and support for certificate revocation lists :) Of course. Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
