Helen Thomas – People’s Journalist - Resigns

By

Dr. Habib Siddiqui 


This past week was a sad week in American journalism. Against mounting pressure 
and criticism, Helen Thomas, the dean of the White House press corps, decided 
to resign. She was one of the bravest, no-nonsense, journalists of our time. 
For the past fifty years dating from the Kennedy era she has been dutifully 
performing her duty by asking tough questions that few journalists dared to ask 
the White House. Her career demise came with a simple politically incorrect 
answer to a sly question from a Jewish rabbi -- David Nesenoff of Long Island, 
New York, who was at the White House for a Jewish heritage celebration on May 
27. He asked the Hearst Newspapers Op/Ed columnist Ms. Thomas, “Any comments on 
Israel?” Her response that Israeli Jews should “get the hell out of Palestine” 
and “go home” to Germany, Poland and America – where they came from to occupy 
Palestine triggered a wave of denunciations that a narrowly worded apology did 
little to quell.

As expected at the forefront of such criticism against the 89-year old Ms. 
Thomas this time are guys like Ari Fleischer (GW Bush’s first press secretary) 
with dual nationality of Israel and the USA. In 2002, Thomas asked Fleischer: 
“Does the president think that the Palestinians have a right to resist 35 years 
of brutal military occupation and suppression?” Four years later, she told Tony 
Snow, Fleischer’s successor, that the United States “could have stopped the 
bombardment of Lebanon” by Israel, but instead had “gone for collective 
punishment against all of Lebanon and Palestine.” Snow tartly thanked her for 
“the Hezbollah view.” 

Through her grilling questions, Thomas had earned respect from many within the 
anti-war community but befriended none within the White House. One may recall 
her questioning of President George W. Bush in 2006 after he finally ended a 
long boycott of Thomas questions. “Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the 
deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis,” she began. “Every reason given, 
publicly at least, has turned out not to be true.” It was a gutsy criticism of 
the most powerful man on earth! 

Remember the post-9/11 era of embedded journalism when every American 
journalist of name and fame seemed more like a brain-dead reporter parroting 
the Washington position than being objective? Very few dared to challenge the 
official explanation about the justification of Bush’s crusade against the 
Muslim world a.k.a. Global War on Terror, e.g., finding the so-called WMDs. 
Helen Thomas was an exception to that sad saga of American journalism in the 
21st century. She proved bold, courageous and refreshing in a profession that 
had ceased to remain honest, truthful and objective, away from the damning 
influence and interest of the powerful lobbies and big corporations.

Thomas advised Bush not to “keep threatening war every day.” She berated Bush 
at a press conference in July 2007, “Two million Iraqis have fled their country 
as refugees. Two million more are displaced. Thousands and thousands are dead. 
Don’t you understand, you brought the al-Qaeda into Iraq?” She challenged 
President Obama three weeks ago: “When are you going to get out of 
Afghanistan?” “Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real 
excuse? And don’t give us this Bushism, ‘If we don’t go there, they’ll all come 
here.’” Then there was her questioning of White House press secretary Robert 
Gibbs: “What’s the difference between your foreign policy and Bush’s?” “We go 
in to kill and maim and send drones -- is that Christianity?”

As a keen and objective analyst of world affairs, and with roots in the Middle 
East, Thomas knew very well that Israel has been the cause for ‘99 percent of 
all this (Middle-East centric) terrorism.’ Unlike most others in her profession 
working in the USA who are sadly mortgaged to the Israel lobby, she was not 
willing to duck or hide such unkind and ugly assessment of the rogue state. She 
likened Palestinian protesters resisting the “tyrannical occupation” by Israel 
to “those who resisted the Nazi occupation.” During White House press 
briefings, she asked such tough questions like: “Why are we killing people in 
Iraq? Men, women, and children are being killed there. . . . It’s outrageous.” 

Obviously, Ms. Thomas’s pointed questions were embarrassing to the war party. 
She earned enmity not only from those merchants of war but also from many 
Jewish and Christian-Zionist colleagues whose allegiance remained more to the 
Zionist state than the USA. They despised her criticism of Israel and wanted 
her to die or disappear. Not surprisingly, her harsh remarks about Israel on 
May 27 were videotaped and later posted in Nesenoff’s RabbiLIVE.com website by 
the rabbi’s son. Over the next few days, the pro-Israel lobby, politicians and 
journalists savaged Thomas over her candid statement repudiating Israel. They 
called her anti-Semite, a Jew-hater, offering the ‘official Hamas and Hizbullah 
position,’ and so on and so forth. Robert Gibbs denounce her remarks, and the 
White House Correspondents’ Association announced that it was considering 
whether to revoke her privileged seat in the front row of the White house 
briefing room. That meeting will no longer be necessary. She resigned. 

Helen Thomas stood out for truth and honesty in journalism away from the 
overwhelming dehumanizing influence of the Israel-firsters in Washington. In a 
pro-Israel, Zionist dominated media world, expressing views that are perceived 
to be hostile to the interest of the pariah state of Israel can be 
journalistically suicidal. It was, thus, not a question of why but when that 
final curtain would be drawn on Helen Thomas’s glorious journalist career.  And 
that’s what happened last week in Washington. 

Helen Thomas will be deeply missed by millions of her admirers who have learned 
to expect that she would never betray their public trust. With her pointed 
interrogations and politically incorrect and candid remarks, she showed the 
best in journalism and earned their respect and admiration. Now that Helen 
Thomas is gone, there is more need than ever before for others in the White 
House press briefing room to fulfill that noble role and share her courage and 
opinion. Every one standing on that podium should be regarded with skepticism 
and must face tough interrogations, and not soft-balls, so that nothing but the 
truth comes out. As Thomas famously remarked last year of the White House, 
“What the hell do they think we are, puppets? . . . They are our public 
servants. We pay them.”  


Will the next Helen Thomas emerge in the White House press briefing room?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Habib Siddiqui is a peace and human rights activist, and chairman of the 
Board of Directors of the Bangladesh Expatriate Council, USA. He writes from 
Pennsylvania. sa...@aol.com 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

To subscribe send email to:
muslim-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

http://islammyreligion.wordpress.com

What will you sacrifice this eid?
0800 520 0000
www.islamic-relief.org.uk
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/muslim/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/muslim/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    muslim-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    muslim-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    muslim-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to