Assalamo Alykum wa Rehmatullahe wa Barakaatuh,

Religion and Science have always been considered to be twin sisters by Islam, 
and today at a time when Science has taken great strides, they still continue 
to be associated.

Furthermore, certain scientific data are used for a better understanding of the 
Quranic text. 

In this century, scientific findings have dealt a fatal blow to religious 
belief for many; it is precisely in the light of such scientific discoveries 
that an objective examination of the Islamic Revelation can be made, which 
highlights the supernatural character of that Revelation. 

After a ten-year study, the famous French physician Maurice Bucaille addressed 
the French Academy of Medicine in 1976, and expressed the complete agreement of 
the Quran and findings of modern science. He presented his study on certain 
statements in the Quran concerning physiology and reproduction. 

His reason for doing so was that: "Our knowledge of these disciplines is such 
that it is impossible to explain how a text produced at the time of the Quran 
could have contained ideas that have only been discovered in modern times". 

Decades later, noted embryologist and expert, Keith L. Moore, upon being 
presented with the statements made in the Quran regarding the stages of 
formation of the embryo -- from the mixing of the male and female gametes up to 
the embryo's full development remarked: "It has been a pleasure for me to help 
clarify statements in the Quran about human development. It is clear to me that 
these statements must have come to Muhammad from God because almost all of this 
knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later." 

Professor Moore presented his findings to scientists at several conferences. 
Several Canadian periodicals published many of Moore's statements, and in 
addition, he presented three television programs in which he highlighted the 
compatibility of modern science with what has been revealed in the Quran 1400 
years ago. Consequently, he was asked: "Does this mean that you believe that 
the Quran is the word of God?" to which he replied: "I find no difficulty in 
accepting this." 

In fact, Professor Moore was so amazed at the accuracy of the descriptions and 
the terminology used for the various stages of the development of the embryo 
that he modified his own textbook on the subject. He incorporated all the 
relevant Quranic passages and authentic statements of the Prophet Muhammad, 
sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam, , into his book, The Developing Human: 
Clinically Oriented Embryology with Islamic Additions, published by WB Saunders 
in 1987 and a standard university textbook in the United States. The book now 
contains passages of the Quran and the Hadeeth (verified statements of the 
Prophet Muhammad, sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) for every stage of 
development, and Professor Moore has also adopted the classification used in 
the above two sources. 

Consider also the statement of Tejatet Tejasen (Professor at the Dept. of 
Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mei University, Thailand) after his study 
on the Quranic passages dealing with embryology: "From my studies and what I 
have learnt at this conference I believe that everything that has been recorded 
in the Quran 1400 years ago must be true. That can be proved through the 
scientific way". 

Consider also the statement of E. Marshal Johnson (Professor and Chairman, 
Dept. of Anatomy, Daniel Bough Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 
Philadelphia, USA) when he became aware of such statements in the Quran and 
investigated them: "The Quran describes not only the development of external 
form but emphasizes also the internal stages -- the stages inside the embryo of 
its creation and development, emphasizing major events recognized by 
contemporary science... If I were to transpose myself into that era, knowing 
what I do today and describing things, I could not describe the things that 
were described... I see no evidence to refute the concept that this individual 
Muhammad, had to be developing this information from some place... so I see 
nothing in conflict with the concept that divine intervention was involved..." 

Consider also the statement of T.V.N. Persaud (Professor and Head, Dept. of 
Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Canada):  
"Muhammad was a very ordinary man. He couldn't read, didn't know how to write, 
in fact he was an illiterate... we're talking about 1400 years ago, you have 
some illiterate person making profound statements that are amazingly accurate, 
of a scientific nature... I personally can't see how this could be mere chance, 
there are too many accuracies and like Dr. Moore I have no difficulty in my 
mind reconciling that this is a divine inspiration or revelation which led him 
to these statements".

These are just a few of numerous quotes from the scientific community regarding 
the nature and the origins of the Quran. In fact, the Quran does not just speak 
about embryology, but about hundreds of other phenomena -- including the earth 
and sun being round, revolving around their own axis and following their own 
orbits; the origin and formation of the universe; the two types of seas between 
which is a barrier; the role of mountains in stabilizing the earth's crust; the 
expansion of the universe; the precise nature of the water cycle; the change in 
atmospheric pressure at high altitudes; the gender of the bee which is 
responsible for producing honey (female); the stars consuming themselves via 
the combustion of their gases and this being the source of their light and many 
more. 

The Quran and the Sunnah (authentic sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, 
sallaallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) make statements on literally hundreds of 
phenomena, and at the same time openly invite intelligent people to verify 
them. If any one from the scientific community were to make hundreds of new 
claims regarding his specialty and call all his colleagues to prove him wrong, 
he would know without doubt that he is standing on shaky ground. What about the 
one who makes such claims about the specialties of others, would he dare to 
make such a claim? 

Yet, one would be surprised to learn that precisely such a scientific approach 
has been commanded in the Quran with the objective of ascertaining its 
truthfulness. Allaah Says in the Quran (what means): "Do they not reflect upon 
the Quran, or are there locks upon (their) hearts." [Quran 47:24] 
And (what means): "Do they not reflect upon the Quran. If it had been from 
(any) other than Allaah, they would have found within it much contradiction." 
[Quran 4:82] 

Therefore, Islamic religious beliefs are not based upon blind acceptance, as 
many have generalized in all other religions, and thus falsely attributed to 
the Quran and Islam. This break between Science and Religion occurred in Europe 
over the past 300-400 years, when scientific advancement and its findings were 
seen as heretical, its proponents ridiculed and often exiled and tortured. 

The Islamic community has never had that experience. It is true that within the 
academic community capabilities differ, and thus some people may be unable to 
ascertain the truth of Islam, and therefore may accept it blindly. But they 
have the opportunity to ask the scholars, those who are in a position to make 
such a judgment. It is from the principles of wisdom and justice that `when you 
don't know, don't make a judgment yourself, but rather consult one who is in a 
position to do so.' 

Summarized from: The Quran and Modern Science  by Amjad Rafiq
Courtesy:www.IslamWeb.net
Compiled, edited and adapted by Khalid Latif, e-tabligue
 




Reply via email to