The following constructions look intuitive but are not valid PMX at
this stage:
c4x3 r d
( one of the three notes is a rest )
c4x3 d.e
( one of the three notes is dotted and another short )
One can approximate them as follows:
(assuming 4/4 meter)
m3800 \triolet{p}\ c8 r d \m3400
m3800 \triolet{p}\ c8 d.e \m3400
This does not look quite right because the notes are too far apart.
Question:
Can one override the selection of \NOTes ... \en etc made by PMX?
Suggestion:
A possible syntax for handling constructions like these could be:
t8x3/2 c8 r d t8x3/2 c8 d.e t8x3/2 c4 d8
where the third is a 2+1 triplet. The word t[n1]x[n2]/[n3] stands
for "tuplet of n1-th notes with n2 in the time of n3"
Dirk
