> I was within minutes of uploading a new version, but since you asked,
> I think I'll put this in first. It in fact already was on the wish
> list, but fairly far down. This request has made it respectable.
> Stay tuned.
Great, I'm looking forward to it.
> But in the meantime, if you can't wait, use in-line TeX, e.g.,
Thanks for your help, I think this will do for now.
> although this example also shows that PMX doesn't account for the
> figure on the 2nd note when computing the baseline,
Speaking of which: for my taste there could be a little more distance
between the figures and the lowest bass note. Is there a way to
globally shift all figures down by a specified amount? I wouldn't mind
if I had to hack pmx.tex, I just can't figure out myself how to do this.
Another related issue: in the following example, PMX produces the
offsets -.8\noteskip and -.2\noteskip for the 2nd and 4th figure,
respectively. I have to change this to -.75 and -.25 in the resulting
.tex file to make it look good.
1 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 20 0
b
./
w2.5i
a03 5# x1464 x245 x34# | d0- | /
--
Stefan Haller
Berlin, Germany
http://www.snafu.de/~stk/
