> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 18:53:14 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eckart Begemann)
partial answer:
> 1) How can I shift accidentals within PMX-code?
[...]
> I find inline-TeX in this case not so useful, because
> you never know the present state of the \transpose-register,
> so you would have to trie it, which seems kind of stange ....
There is no problem to make in-line TeX and PMX completely
independant. Use "!" to reset the transpose register for your
in-line TeX and use grouping "{...}" to avoid confusing the PMX
code. I often use "\\def\z{}\" at the very beginning of a PMX-
source and e.g. "... \z{\lsh{!'c}} ..." as in-line TeX.
I believe that Don will answer the original problem.
> 2) At the end of the piece I trie to use the ID-code for slurs,
> (search for "(A" and ")A").
> but it does not come out as I want ...
> What is my mistake? Is it due to features of \nextvoice?
If I remember right I had the same problem and found that a single
voice is the "lower" voice. So you start the "A"-slur in the upper-
voice and try to end it in the lower voice.
I pointed Don already at that problem, because it's difficult to solve
by the user. If a piece has only a few place with two voices but a lot
of complicated slurs it can be neccessary to code always two voices,
where only one is needed.
> 3) Further I would suggest PMX to provide a command which
> takes a single note out of its measure controll
> and makes it an unspaced note.
Imho this is a good proposal. Nevertheless it's fine that PMX
allows to code such things as in-line TeX. So we can/have_to
wait for a PMX-solution.
-- Werner
