Angelo Pagan wrote:
> Dear sirs,
>
> I started to experiment with M-Tx a few days ago and I think it is very
> usefull.
>
> I play the organ in the church in front of my home and I think it is much
> more simple to play using a soprano+figured bass score then soprano+chords.
>
> I converted a fev of my handwritten hymns/songs to this form and the result
> is very nice.
>
> I'm not able to find how to write a "transitus irregularis" that is the a
> simbol like a circle, or \cup, or trill (^^^^) or a slash instead of figures
> to say that with the current bass note should be sound the harmonization of
> the following note.
I'm not aquainted with the term "transitus irregularis" and hasn't been able to
look it up in my music dictionarys (The Harvard D. & Hugo Riemann's
Musiklexicon). As far as I understand your question you want to significate
anticipation of a chord belonging to a note in the bass part _after_ the current
note. None of the articles concerning thorough bass/generalbass in the above
mentioned dictionaries seem to mention this phenomenon. If this is what you
intend I'm not able to help you. If you, however, want to indicate e.g. a series
of transposed sixths chords initiated by a leading '6' followed by forward
slashes (cf. Harv. Dict, article on th. b.) the m-tx uptext - used as downtex -
could do the trick.
Meter: C/
Style: piano
Bars/Line: 4
g4 g a b | c d c b | c0
U: @v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / /
c4 e f d 6 | e 6 f e d | c0
Regards
--
Christian Mondrup, Computer Programmer
Scandiatransplant, Skejby Hospital, University Hospital of Aarhus
Brendstrupgaardsvej, DK 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Phone: +45 89 49 53 01, Telefax: +45 89 49 60 07
