Hi!
Thanks for your opinions on `LargePMX'.
So that's two votes in favour of the modified version, and one against.
I find Dirk's argument convinving that a newbie user is hardly likely to
use such a large number of voices or slurs. For this reason, I won't
make any changes to the released archive now; that gives me some time to
think about possible solutions.
It might be possible to make the nm parameter modifiable in the C code
after all. The basic idea is to find out where the nm value has been
substituted in the C code generated by f2c and write a script to alter
those numbers in <pmxab.c>. The easiest way to do this would certainly be
to write a Perl script. Does everybody interested in a higher nm value
have a Perl interpreter available? Otherwise I think I can work out a
short C program.
Warmest Regards,
Stefan.
>
> Werner Icking wrote, on the topic of a PMX variant that allows 15 voices:
> >
> > So your PMX-variant may result in nasty error-situations that
> >
> Dirk Laurie wrote:
> > So I vote in favour of the big PMX.
>
> So my vote is definitely IN FAVOR for the large version if an appropriate
> caveat is clearly stated in the manual.
======================================================================
`` ... life, viewed rationally and without illusion, appears to
be a nonsense tale told by an idiot mathematician. ''
-- Martin Gardner
======================================================================
HomeBrew Entertainment [site under construction]
www: http://www.mathematik.uni-stuttgart.de/~evert/
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Evert)
