Begemann wrote
>3) PMX Grace notes
>
> I still have the impression, that PMX (1.52...!) grace note
> coding (Gf) does not accept an octave specification in
> all cases (Gf+ or Gf- ). Has this been corrected to
> PMX200?
Yes.
>4) PMX figures
> Once again I insist on bugging you, dear Don, whether you could
> invent a way to put figures like 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.
> In early baroque times, figures up to 18 have been used,
> in Caccini (1602, Nuove Musiche) you would find '14'.
> And it is a loss of information if you just switch this
> figure to '7'.
It's already invented: \Figu0{10}\ :-) .
Seriously, this happens so rarely that activating it in PMX has almost a
vanishing priority on the to-do list. And I even have used such
constructions in my own editions.
--Don
