I have to apologize - I didn't understand your intention.
As a pmx newbie (haven't used it for a long time) I didn't use relative notes, i.e., I
wrote
c44 d44 e44 ....
If you use no absolute octaves except for the first note it is relatively easy.
Thanks a lot.
Rainer adS
PS
I have lost the link to the pmx-to-MIDI program.
Anybody got it?
PPS
Concerning the meter change, of course, everybody was right - this IS good music
typesetting.
I normally read lute tablature and late 16th/early 17th century menusural notation.
You won't find many meter changes here :)
Christof Biebricher wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Rainer aus dem Spring wrote:
>
> >
> > I am entering scores to study them... Nobody plays 5 part viol music from the
>score.
> >
> > > >
> > > Sure. You can take any clef you like.
> >
> >
> > > The octavated G clef is only used for the Tenor.
> > Nonsense.
> >
> > > Mtx does it automatically. In pmx, just change the octava numbers.
> >
> > Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha , i.e., it is NOT possible(?).
> >
> Just take the BWV146 example I had shown in the previous email.
> change the clef line from bnas to bttt and the tenor beginning
> from g44 to g45, and rerun pmx. That is all, try yourself!
>
> Christof
> --
> Prof. Dr. Christof Biebricher
> Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
> D-37070 Gottingen
> Tel: +49 (551) 201 1442
> FAX: +49 (551) 201 1435
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
