Hi, Thanks for replies. Werner Icking wrote:- >If you look into ref210.tex you can see that it does not contain any MusiXTeX, >it's pure LaTeX (2.09?). Yes, this was the point I was trying to make. It is not just a MusixTeX problem. I was assuming that MusixTeX uses a LaTeX routine/font? to draw lines and asking if anyone knew what it was. Sorry if I wasn't clear. (However, see the new info below which now leads me to believe it's an xdvi problem). Bob Tennant wrote:- >Did you do texconfig? Make sure the environment variable >TEXMF has the right value (the root of the tetex tree). Yes. kpsexpand '$TEXMF' gives !!/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf that is correct. NEW INFO. My previous message was sent because no lines appeared when I viewed the .dvi file on screen using xdvi (in Linux). However, I have now found that, if I convert to a postscript file (using dvips ) then ghostview shows all the expected lines on screen and these will print from the .ps file. So at least I can now get on but I'd still like to get the screen view of the .dvi file sorted out. If anyone has any ideas I'd be grateful. -- Best wishes, Howard. (A.H.Gilbert, Thornaby, North Yorkshire) ============================================================================ Previous message:- I recently downloaded and installed teTeX 1.0 (previously used 0.4). I now find that dvi output from PMX/Musixtex is totally devoid of lines. All noteheads, clefs and text are there but no stave lines no barlines and no stems on notes. I think the problem lies in teTeX rather than Musixtex 'cos I tried processing the PMX file ref210.tex which I think has lines on it but I got none. What part of my instalation should I look at to find the problem? How does Musixtex do lines? Please help if you can.
