> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:26:07 +0200 (MEST)
> From: Joerg Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Werner Icking wrote:

[...]
> > If something can be done with "MusiXTeX" or "PMX on top of MusiXTeX",
> > then it should be done (imho) with PMX, because it's really better
> > readable. On the other hand there are limits with PMX which can
> > be overcome using MusiXTeX directly.
> 
> Yes, for instance such triplets (see attachment!) Or does anyboy 
> know a PMX representation ?

Up to now PMX does not support triplets which contain a quadruplet
for one of the three notes of the triplet. But: in the year 2525 ...

Nevertheless in-line TeX makes it possible and the spacing of the
solution is better than that of your attachment:

1 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 20 0

t
./

\\let\ibbbusav\ibbbu\
\\let\qbsav\qb\
\\let\tbusav\tbu\

\\def\ibuasibbbu{\def\ibbbu##1##2##3{\let\ibbbu\ibbbusav\ibu{##1}{##2}{##3}}}\
\\def\nbbbuqbasqb{\def\qb##1##2{\nbbbu##1\let\qb\qbsav\qb{##1}{##2}}}\
\\def\offasqb{\def\qb##1##2{\let\qb\qbsav\pitch{##2}\off{.3\noteskip}}}\
\\def\offastbuqb{\def\tbu##1{\let\tbu\tbusav}\
 \\def\qb##1##2{\let\qb\qbsav\pitch{##2}\off{.3\noteskip}}}\
\\def\pitch#1{\zcharnote{#1}{}}\
\\def\tbbuqbasqb{\def\qb##1##2{\tbbu##1\let\qb\qbsav\qb{##1}{##2}}}\
\\def\tbuqbasqb{\def\qb##1##2{\tbu##1\let\qb\qbsav\qb{##1}{##2}}}\

\\def\myxnum#1#2#3{{\xnum{#1}{#2}{#3}}}\

\myxnum{3.5}{!c}3\ibuasibbbu\ g44x12n \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g
 \nbbbuqbasqb\ g g g \tbbuqbasqb\ g
 \tbuqbasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offastbuqb\ g
 g g g /
\myxnum{3.5}{!c}3\ibuasibbbu\ g44x12n \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g
 \nbbbuqbasqb\ g g g \tbbuqbasqb\ g
 \tbuqbasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offastbuqb\ g
 g g g /
\myxnum{3.5}{!c}3\ibuasibbbu\ g44x12n \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g
 \nbbbuqbasqb\ g g g \tbbuqbasqb\ g
 \tbuqbasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offasqb\ g \offastbuqb\ g
 g g g /


And for me it's readable :-)

And maybe better readable than your MusiXTeX solution if that is
modified to ensure correct spacing.

-- Werner

PS: Your attachment was LaTeX plus MusiXTeX. If LaTeX isn't really
    neccessary for the music then I would drop LaTeX to avoid
    trouble when e.g. musixmad.tex is required.

Reply via email to