Christian Mensing wrote:
>
> Werner Icking wrote:
> >
> > Yes, more people will read your stuff if you put it on the web!
> >
> > And there are much more people in the world which use MS-Word than TeX.
> > Does that count?
> >
> > If you supply good sheet music on the web (and tell the people how
> > they can fetch and read it), they will fetch and read it.
> >
> > -- Werner
>
> Hello,
>
> I agree totally. Both are valid formats. There is virtually no
> difference
> in print quality if using dvips or pdftex with pk600 fonts.
>
> #!/bin/sh
> # pdfmusix
> #
> rm $1.mx*
> pdftex $1
> musixflx $1
> pdftex $1
>
> produces straight forward pdf files which are about 1/5 in size of a ps
> file.
ghostview (gv) displays pdf files thus produced with the same (quite
acceptable) screen rendering quality as dvipdfm produced files. But that
is not the case with Acrobat Reader used by hosts of web users. Here the
two conversion methods make a remarkable difference - favouring dvipdfm.
When it comes to hardcopy printing both methods are equally good.
--
Christian Mondrup, Computer Programmer
Scandiatransplant, Skejby Hospital, University Hospital of Aarhus
Brendstrupgaardsvej, DK 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Phone: +45 89 49 53 01
