On 2007-02-27 12:15:02 -0600, David Champion wrote: > It was felt previously that since applying defaults would be essentially > the same as parsing a set of default rules in Muttrc (just done by > direct C calls instead), putting the defaults into Muttrc was a good > way of setting defaults, and more easily maintained. But if (as > Vincent says) upgrade paths make this a problem, then defaults could be > installed as above.
I don't think the defaults should be implemented in a Muttrc, not because of upgrade problems, but because there should be an easy and automatical way to cancel the defaults. The problem is that the defaults consist in a *list* of statements, and IMHO, if the user adds a statement in his muttrc, then the whole default list should be ignored. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
