On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:35:18PM +0000, Dave wrote: > How about runtime options having two shadow compile-time options, > default-blah and force-blah? Normally, a sysadmin would only set > default-blah options (or none at all, ideally), but when a sysadmin > decides to pursue the boobietrap approach, he still has the option of > setting force-blah options.
> How does that sound? > like KDE's kiosk framework, only less flexible. :) not sure it actually *is* - it just sounds like that. :) keywords are kconfig and immutable. i won't comment on the applicability or even usefulness of such a framework for mutt ... needless to say, i agree with the rest of your mail. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
