On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:03:30AM +0900, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > When I looked around for maintainer info about urlview a while > back, I think I remember finding .. nothing. I think it has not > been maintained for a looong time. Anyway, aren't there better > and simpler ways now for doing what urlview was intended to do? I > mean, it seems easier to just have a script that parses out URLs, > generates a list of them as an HTML page, and just pipes that page > to whatever the user has set a default browser.
To each his own. I find it faster/easier to navigate the list of urls with my keyboard via urlview than a list of links displayed in firefox. I suppose if I went full text-only and used w3m, then skipping urlview would be faster. :-) me
