On 2007-09-19 08:26:04 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > * Kyle Wheeler [07-09-18 09:27:06 -0500] wrote: >> There's also option 3) refuse to send the mail, and display an error >> message. I prefer this option. I don't like the idea of mutt being a >> potential source of bad email. > > With messages created from scratch locally that could be an option > (or at least issue a warning). But given you received a mail with a > broken encoding already, 3) would mean you couldn't reply to it > unless you manually fix the encoding.
Mutt should fix the encoding for the user. In particular when starting the editor (for a reply), Mutt should make sure that everything is valid in the specified encoding. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
