On 2008-03-03 15:32:32 +0000, Paul Walker wrote: > At least for myself, I'd prefer a warning free build to warnings > which come out just because someone might potentially, > hypothetically change a piece of code at some random time in the > indefinite future. I think a warning-free build gives us much > more in terms of usefulness.
> Defensive programming is all very well, but you can definitely > take it too far. :-) I don't think these particular cases are taken too far. -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
