#3090: Mutt removes In-Reply-To header field Comment (by pdmef):
Replying to [comment:5 vinc17]: > > A fix could be to avoid writing out In-Reply-To and use References instead which still gives the user the chance to manually adjust threads in the editor. > > That's a bad idea: some MUA's only understand the In-Reply-To header (but this is quite old, and I don't remember which ones -- perhaps Emacs, at least I can see that it doesn't generate a References header). I didn't mean to eventually sent this out, I meant to use References instead of In-Reply-To when creating and parsing the message during editing to avoid changing message parsers this late before 1.6 and still fix the issue before it gets released. -- Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3090#comment:7>
