Rocco Rutte wrote: [Fri Aug 15 2008, 04:21:41AM EDT] > * Kyle Wheeler wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 13 at 12:27 AM, quoth Brendan Cully: > >>> This patch makes me uneasy (especially during a freeze), but I'm >>> willing to apply it if no one else objects. I don't see what kind of >>> damage a hook might do in batch mode, but I can't convince myself >>> that it's harmless either. > >> Well, I imagine anyone currently using mutt in batch mode on a regular >> basis (e.g. with cron) already has a working setup, and enabling hooks >> by default has the potential at least to break those setups. > > If either way isn't documented (e.g. hooks do/don't work in batch mode) > IMHO it can be seen as a bug that needs to be fixed. When it possibly > breaks setups, we add a note to UPDATING.
I think the conversation directly related to this patch ended with this comment from Rocco. Any chance we can still see this patch applied? Thanks, Aron
