On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:56:45PM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:01:02PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:19:33PM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote: > >> Nice, I like it. I've got only a minor problem with it. The $ is > >> displayed in a new column which IMHO is not such a good idea. > >> Wouldn't it be better to be used in the second column where > >> things like P s are displayed? > > > > That's a good question. I was concerned about overriding other message > > flags that someone may also want to see. I'm happy to modify this to > > override flags in an existing column if there's enough consensus. > > > > Will Fiveash > > I think the column for P/s would be fine to override as I > normally don't need that information after I moved the mail to > another mailbox (if I sync or close this mailbox it's deleted > anyway). The question is if my thoughts above are still valid > when you use C to copy the mail somewhere else. I'm not entirely > sure there.
Right, or one may want to undelete a message based on those flags and if they've saved the message first then the flags will be hidden. > Anyway, I like this patch very much and use it my local mutt, my > terminal is wide enough to support one more column ;-) Yeah, the use of one additional column hasn't been a problem for me. -- Will Fiveash
