Am 18.06.2013 07:14, schrieb [email protected]: > Problems with mutt.1:
[...] > --- mutt.1-unpatched 2012-06-29 14:51:10.361755678 -0400 > +++ mutt.1 2012-06-29 14:52:01.213754726 -0400 > @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ > Specify a blind-carbon-copy (BCC) recipient > .IP "-c \fIaddress\fP" > Specify a carbon-copy (CC) recipient > -.IP "-d \fIlevel\fp" > -If mutt was complied with +DEBUG log debugging output to ~/.muttdebug0. > +.IP "-d \fIlevel\fP" > +If mutt was compiled with +DEBUG log debugging output to ~/.muttdebug0. > \fILevel\fP can range from 1-5 and effects verbosity. A value of 2 is > recommended. > .IP "-D" Speaking of which, for command-line-options, these should all be \-c, \-d, or \-D (same for all other options and their occurrences), lest these be rendered as Unicode hyphens (U+2010) by newer formatters (groff!); then, copying and pasting from the manual page would no longer work because we expect a minus on the CLI. Some distros have hacked their groff packages because this is such a common mistake in the roff input. See groff_char(7).
