On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:53:10PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 11:41:50AM +0100, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
>
> > This patch saves attachments with a sane umask so that they're readable by
> > others.
>
> I would think that a "sane" umask would be a conservative one that's not
> readable by others. This might be a *convenient* umask for some people,
> but probably not something that would make sense for adoption.
>
> I would think an option to make it configurable would be more useful
> than just hard-coding it to be world readable, though.
The 'sane' umask is the one that was set by the user before mutt
was run.
You certainly shouldn't allow permissions that it excluded.
David
--
David Laight: [email protected]
