On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 14:44:49 -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > OK, I see how you're doing the DAG stuff. I guess to see what I > wanted to see, I would have needed to specify a more complicated > graph, something like this: > > 1 -> 2 > 2 -> 3 > 1 -> 4 > 4 -> 5 > 5 -> 6 > 6 -> 7 > 1 -> 8 > 3,7,8 -> 9 > > =8^)
The DAG sorting gives 1 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K 1 2 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K ├─>Re: 1 -> 2 3 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K │ └─>Re: 2 -> 3 4 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K ├───│>Re: 1 -> 4 5 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K │ │└─>Re: 4 -> 5 6 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K │ │ └─>Re: 5 -> 6 7 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K │ │ └─>Re: 6 -> 7 8 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K └───│──────│>Re: 1 -> 8 9 F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K └──────┴┴─>Re: 3, 7, 8 -> 9 compared to the standard tree view 1 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K 1 2 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K ├─>Re: 1 -> 4 3 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K │ └─>Re: 4 -> 5 4 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K │ └─>Re: 5 -> 6 5 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K │ └─>Re: 6 -> 7 6 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K ├─>Re: 1 -> 8 7 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K └─>Re: 1 -> 2 8 r F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K └─>Re: 2 -> 3 9 F 2014-03-18 To AH 0.2K └─>Re: 3, 7, 8 -> 9 Regards Anders
