All, I wanted to take a moment to point out that I think the group-reply behavior, in particular when Reply-To is set, is not intuitive, and I dare say also not sane.
g <group-reply> reply to all recipients Great! Exactly what I want. Except, if reply-to is set, it doesn't do that. What I want it to do is reply to the sender (obviously via reply-to if that is set and not being ignored) AND all of the recipients. But when Reply-To is set, it ONLY replies to the address in Reply-To. What is the rationale for this? It is counter to the user's expectation, and provides nothing that the simple reply does not. So what's the point? -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
pgp6t7v2RhlrJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
