On Mon, Dec 01, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > In general, mutt checks NULLs pretty well, but returning NULL from > mutt_substrdup() isn't without risk of just generating a segfault in > another place. So personally I would vote for the second or third > choice.
Why is there any risk? Just audit the code. mutt source is just a few files and mutt is not a library with external callers... Olaf
