David J. Weller-Fahy wrote: > * Kevin J. McCarthy <[email protected]> [2015-05-23 16:20 -0400]: > >Currently I have left the root cert inside the intermediary file. If > >this is bad or wrong behaviour, I can change it, it was just easier > >that way. > > I do not think that is bad behavior.
Okay, I'll leave it as is then. > Let me know if you still need the PEM, but I believe the second patch > you sent solves the problem. No, that's fine. I think the change makes sense and shouldn't really cause any problems. > >Here's a revised patch loosening up the attributes parsing and changing > >it to only prompt once for a label. > > I just tried the new patch and everything works as it should, thanks! Great! I will push it as soon as dev.mutt.org comes back up. Thanks for your help. > Now the only problem is mutt prompting to use the second key every time > when trying to encrypt. That will be my next project, at the same time as adding a "purpose" field to the index. I'll probably add a "sime_keys update_index" command to add the missing purpose field for old entries in the index, and maybe update the trust field (re-checking for expired fields, for instance). -Kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
