#3764: group-reply on email with several adresses in To: does not reply to group
of participants
-----------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: Gregor_Zattler | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: mutt | Version: 1.5.23
Resolution: invalid | Keywords: group-reply
-----------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by Gregor_Zattler):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
Comment:
Replying to [comment:2 kevin8t8]:
> Hi Gregor,
>
> Some things I would suggest to look at are:
>
> 1. The $metoo and alternates settings
(http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#alternates).
>
> 2. If the original email had a Reply-To header and your $reply_to
setting.
>
> 3. If the original email had a Mail-Followup-To header and your
$honor_followup_to setting.
>
> Keep in mind that alternates is a regular expression, so if you aren't
careful it may match more than you intended:
> {{{
> # bad:
> alternates '[email protected]'
>
> # good:
> alternates '^foo@bar\.baz$"
> }}}
Thanks for this help.
> [As an aside, it would be greatly appreciated if you would email mutt-
users or visit the #mutt irc channel to double check before filing a bug
for the developers for something like this. I have pretty high confidence
the group-reply command (albeit extremely customizable) is working
properly, and the mutt-users and #mutt folks are much better at helping
troubleshoot these kinds of things.]
You were right, there is no problem when without any configuration. I
will do so in future case of problems.
Thanks, gregor
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3764#comment:3>
Mutt <http://www.mutt.org/>
The Mutt mail user agent
