On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:16:20PM -0400, Derek Schrock wrote: > Seeing that there was already some objections to the delivery and > contents I was going to repatchbomb a split patch (one for %r/R and one > for attribution buffer change). > i don't think it makes sense to split off that part, either - they are really quite interlocked, and it just makes it harder to find the relation if you do it separately (which may be a problem when somebody uses your patch as a template and misses the second part). but the decision is ultimately with kevin (and you).
- [PATCH 2 of 3] update docs for %r/%R Derek Schrock
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] update docs for %r/%R Moritz Barsnick
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] update docs for %r/%R Derek Schrock
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] update docs for %r/%R David Champion
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] update docs for %r/%R Cameron Simpson
- [PATCH 3 of 3] attribution is to small when dealing wit... Derek Schrock
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patch-1.5.24-index_format-... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patch-1.5.24-index_format-... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patch-1.5.24-index_fo... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patch-1.5.24-inde... Derek Schrock
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patch-1.5.24-... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patch-1.5.24-... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patch-1.5... Derek Schrock
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb patc... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] patchbomb ... Kevin J. McCarthy