On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:16:42PM -0600, David Champion wrote: > Agreed - but in particular, I think that the 1.6 blockers in Trac are > too big. They've been blocking 1.6 for years, and I think we're to the > point now where 1.6 is more important than those particular issues. I > think that we should bite only what we can chew for 1.6.
Yup, I was just looking at them and thinking the same thing. A couple of them may be addressable, but otherwise I suggest we move them out of there. > I'm fine with stable/default branching. I assume this workflow: commit > to default, merge to stable, tag releases from stable. I think the > versioning split just hasn't really worked in our favor. Okay, it looks like we're in agreement here too. That was easy enough. :-) > * On 22 Nov 2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > I know you have an extensive list of patches you maintain. Are > > there any you'd like to get committed before 1.6.0? What about the > > command-on-new-mail series? (No pressure, just asking...) > > Yes, I would like to (mainly that one and the keywords series), but if > 1.6 is otherwise ready I don't want to be the reason it's not coming > out. I may actually have some time to work on this in the next 5-6 > weeks though. That's sounds just fine. For now, let's plan on the February/March timeframe, and see how things go over the next couple months. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA http://www.8t8.us/configs/gpg-key-transition-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
