On 2016-04-05 14:43:15 +0100, Richard Russon wrote: > > > Limit-Current-Thread Limit Index View to Current Thread > > > > -1. Would prefer a ~. that matches the current message; then a ~(~.) > > macro would be equivalent. > > That's what I thought, but then I looked at the code. > (Ignoring the fact that most of the alphabet is already used up) > > The limiting machinery doesn't take any parameters, it just works on the > globals. Limiting to the "current thread" means passing a variable and > changing a lot of code.
Couldn't ~. be changed internally to ~m<number> at evaluation time? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
